Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 8 pull requests #124693

Closed

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Enselic and others added 24 commits May 2, 2024 19:48
…pe=...`

In the stabilization attempt of `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]`, a concern
was raised related to using a language attribute for the feature: Long
term, we want `fn lang_start()` to be definable by any crate, not just
libstd. Having a special language attribute in that case becomes
awkward.

So as a first step towards towards the next stabilization attempt, this
PR changes the `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` attribute to a compiler flag
`-Zon-broken-pipe=...` to remove that concern, since now the language
is not "contaminated" by this feature.

Another point was also raised, namely that the ui should not leak
**how** it does things, but rather what the **end effect** is. The new
flag uses the proposed naming. This is of course something that can be
iterated on further before stabilization.
I found these with a hacky shell script.
There are a few common abbreviations like `use rustc_ast as ast` and
`use rust_hir as hir` for names that are used a lot. But there are also
some cases where a crate is renamed just once in the whole codebase, and
that ends up making things harder to read rather than easier. This
commit removes them.
This is a case where `rustc_parse_format` is renamed as `parse` but a
couple of places don't take advantage.
zkvm is single-threaded, similar to emscripten and wasm.
Use a proof tree visitor to refine the `Obligation` for error reporting in new solver

With the magic of `ProofTreeVisitor`, we can close the gap that we have on `ObligationCause`s being not as descriptive in the new trait solver.

r? lcnr

Needs some work and obviously documentation.
Change `SIGPIPE` ui from `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` to `-Zon-broken-pipe=...`

In the stabilization [attempt](rust-lang#120832) of `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]`, a concern was [raised ](rust-lang#120832 (comment)) related to using a language attribute for the feature: Long term, we want `fn lang_start()` to be definable by any crate, not just libstd. Having a special language attribute in that case becomes awkward.

So as a first step towards the next stabilization attempt, this PR changes the `#[unix_sigpipe = "..."]` attribute to a compiler flag `-Zon-broken-pipe=...` to remove that concern, since now the language is not "contaminated" by this feature.

Another point was [also raised](rust-lang#120832 (comment)), namely that the ui should not leak **how** it does things, but rather what the **end effect** is. The new flag uses the proposed naming. This is of course something that can be iterated on further before stabilization.

Tracking issue: rust-lang#97889
…ckh726

Trim crate graph

This PR removes some unnecessary `Cargo.toml` entries, and makes some other small related cleanups that I found while looking at this stuff.

r? ``@pnkfelix``
…ulacrum

release notes 1.78: add link to interior-mut breaking change

Cc rust-lang#123248 (comment)

r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
…, r=jieyouxu

Migrate `run-make/doctests-keep-binaries` to new rmake.rs format

r? ``@jieyouxu``
…plit-at-checked, r=jhpratt

Stabilize `split_at_checked`

Closes rust-lang#119128

For the const version of `slice::split_at_mut_checked`, I'm reusing the `const_slice_split_at_mut` feature flag (rust-lang#101804). I don't if it okay to reuse tracking issues or if it preferred to create new ones...
zkvm: fix run_tests

`zkvm` is single-threaded, similar to `emscripten` and `wasm`. The `cfg` for `zkvm` seems to have been dropped. This PR adds the `cfg` again.
… r=compiler-errors

Make `Bounds.clauses` private

Construct it through `Bounds::default()`, then consume the clauses via the method `Bounds::clauses()`.

This helps with effects desugaring where `clauses()` is not only the clauses within the `clauses` field.
@rustbot rustbot added A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc O-unix Operating system: Unix-like S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 4, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) rollup A PR which is a rollup labels May 4, 2024
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member Author

bors why did you make two rollups :(

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc O-unix Operating system: Unix-like rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants